ZAMBEZI RIVER BASIN

Informations générale
Carte de localisation
Nom de l'organisation
Zambezi Watercourse Commission
ZAMCOM
Adresse

Secretariat, P. O. Box 30233 Lusaka, Zambia

Téléphone
(260) 22084001/2 27970/3
Courriel de l'organisation
 
Nom du responsable
Tumbare Mike
Année de création
2004
Contacts
Superficie totale
1570000km²
Linéaire de cours d'eau
2 650Km
Nombre d'habitants
100million d'habitants
Pluviométrie

Annual rainfall in the basin varies from 1,800 mm/year in the north to 550 mm/year or less in the south of the basin.

Cultures irriguées

With a total irrigation potential of about 3.2 million ha only about 1.2 million ha are currently under irrigation.

Agriculture non irriguée
 
Site Internet
Bassin
Bassin du Zambèze
Couverture géographique

The Zambezi water course system refers to both surface and groundwater resources of the Zambezi river. It is the largest shared watercourse system in Southern Africa.

Pays riverains
Pays Superficie
Angola
252600km²
Botswana
21900km²
Malawi
112100km²
Mozambique
168000km²
Namibie
21000km²
Tanzanie
27999km²
Zambie
574000km²
Zimbabwe
224000km²
Pays
 
Fonction/mandat

The objective of the Commission is to promote the equitable and reasonable utilization of the water resources of the Zambezi watercourse, and their efficient management and sustainable development. The ZAMCOM advises the member states on the planning, management, utilization, development, protection, and conservation of the Zambezi. The Commission also advises on measures necessary to avoid disputes between the member states and assists in the resolution of conflicts. ZAMCOM collects, evaluates, and disseminates information and data relevant to the implementation of the agreements and fosters greater awareness for the efficient and sustainable management and development of the Zambezi among the population. Furthermore, ZAMCOM aims at promoting, supporting, coordinating and harmonizing the management and development of the water resources and the national water policies.

Structure organisationnelle

ZAMCOM consists of the council of ministers, a Technical Committee and a Secretariat.

Structure organisationnelle de la coopération

The Zambesi Watercourse Commission, ZAMCOM, consists of the Council of Ministers, the Technical Committee, and the Secretariat. The Council is composed of one delegate from each member state. A Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson are elected on the basis of rotation. The Technical Committee is made up of three representatives from each member state and are primarily responsible for implementing the Council’s decisions and developing the River Basin Management Strategy. The Secretariat is headed by an Executive Secretary and is responsible for the technical and administrative support of the Council.

Plan de gestion et programmes d'actions

ZAMCOM is currently working on the development of an Integrated Water Management Plan for the Zambezi River System, a project already initiated in the 1990s as part of the Action Plan for the Environmentally Sound Management of the Common Zambezi River System (ZACPLAN). ZAMCOM took over the responsibility from the bi-national Zambezi River Authority (ZRA).

Monitoring et système d'information

All member states are obliged to inform ZAMCOM of any program, project or activity with regard to the Zambezi watercourse. If one of the other member states opposes planned measures or activities, they are required to start consultations and negotiations and reach a solution. The project is to be postponed during these negotiations. Furthermore, the Commission can conduct a fact-finding study to support the negotiation process.

Régles de prises de décision et procédure d'arbitrage

Decisions are taken unanimously, with two thirds of the member states forming a quorum. In case of a dispute the member states are required to enter into consultations and negotiations. The Council of Ministers may give recommendations. If a dispute cannot be settled, it can be referred to the SADC Tribunal. Disputes between a member state and ZAMCOM can also be brought before the Tribunal.

Financement des structures de coopération

All member states contribute equally to the budget of the Commission. Further details are to be elaborated by the Council.

Participation des parties prennantes

All member states contribute equally to the budget of the Commission. Further details are to be elaborated by the Council.

Historique de la coopération

Plans to establish a river basin organization have existed since the 1980s, but no serious progress was made towards institutionalization of a basin-wide cooperation. In 1987, the governments of the Riparian Countries adopted the Action Plan for the Environmentally Sound Management of the Common Zambezi River System (ZACPLAN). Angola, Namibia, and Malawi joined these efforts in 1990. ZACPLAN consists of 19 projects, the so-called Zambezi Action Projects (ZACPRO). In 2002 the SADC Secretariat headed several rounds of negotiations until finally in July 2004 the Agreement establishing the Zambezi Watercourse Commission (ZAMCOM) was signed.

Date Nom du traité Signataires Bassin
1891-06-11
Spheres of Influence Treaty
Great Britain
Bassin du Limpopo
1953-01-21
Shire Valley Participation Tretay
Great Britain
Portugal
Bassin du Zambèze
1954-11-18
Kwando River Agreement
Great Britain
Portugal
-
1963-11-25
Power Corp Agreement
Northern Rhodesia
Southern Rhodesia
Bassin du Zambèze
1967-04-01
Hydropower Agreement
Portugal
South Africa
Bassin du Zambèze
1984-05-02
Cahora Bassa Project
Mozambique
Portugal
South Africa
Bassin du Zambèze
1987-05-28
Action Plan
Botswana
Mozambique
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Bassin du Zambèze
1987-07-28
Zambezi River Utilization Agreement
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Bassin du Zambèze
2004-07-13
ZAMCOM Agreement
Angola
Botswana
Malawi
Mozambique
Namibia
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Bassin du Zambèze
Challenges

Very large underdeveloped basin, rampant poverty, hydropower/irrigation potential partially tapped, environmental impact assessment required, Zambia (41% of basin area) not a member of ZAMCOM, low stakeholder involvement and limited financial resources, lack of basinwide organization for water resources management, inadequate political dialogue on IWRM, lack of common vision, inadequate funding and lack of cooperation mechanism.