ZAMBEZI RIVER BASIN

Main informations
Location map
Name of Organization
Zambezi Watercourse Commission
ZAMCOM
Administrative Address

Secretariat, P. O. Box 30233 Lusaka, Zambia

Phone
(260) 22084001/2 27970/3
E-Mail
 
Head of Organization
Tumbare Mike
Year Launched
2004
Contacts
Total Area
1570000km²
Length of River
2 650Km
Total Population
100million inhabitants
Total Rainfall

Annual rainfall in the basin varies from 1,800 mm/year in the north to 550 mm/year or less in the south of the basin.

Irrigated Agriculture

With a total irrigation potential of about 3.2 million ha only about 1.2 million ha are currently under irrigation.

Rain-Fed Agriculture
 
Website
Basin
Bassin du Zambèze
Geographical scope

The Zambezi water course system refers to both surface and groundwater resources of the Zambezi river. It is the largest shared watercourse system in Southern Africa.

Riparian Countries
Countries Area
Angola
252600km²
Botswana
21900km²
Malawi
112100km²
Mozambique
168000km²
Namibia
21000km²
Tanzania
27999km²
Zambia
574000km²
Zimbabwe
224000km²
Countries
 
Functions/Mandate

The objective of the Commission is to promote the equitable and reasonable utilization of the water resources of the Zambezi watercourse, and their efficient management and sustainable development. The ZAMCOM advises the member states on the planning, management, utilization, development, protection, and conservation of the Zambezi. The Commission also advises on measures necessary to avoid disputes between the member states and assists in the resolution of conflicts. ZAMCOM collects, evaluates, and disseminates information and data relevant to the implementation of the agreements and fosters greater awareness for the efficient and sustainable management and development of the Zambezi among the population. Furthermore, ZAMCOM aims at promoting, supporting, coordinating and harmonizing the management and development of the water resources and the national water policies.

Organizational Structure

ZAMCOM consists of the council of ministers, a Technical Committee and a Secretariat.

Organizational Structure for Cooperation

The Zambesi Watercourse Commission, ZAMCOM, consists of the Council of Ministers, the Technical Committee, and the Secretariat. The Council is composed of one delegate from each member state. A Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson are elected on the basis of rotation. The Technical Committee is made up of three representatives from each member state and are primarily responsible for implementing the Council’s decisions and developing the River Basin Management Strategy. The Secretariat is headed by an Executive Secretary and is responsible for the technical and administrative support of the Council.

Management Plans and Action Programs

ZAMCOM is currently working on the development of an Integrated Water Management Plan for the Zambezi River System, a project already initiated in the 1990s as part of the Action Plan for the Environmentally Sound Management of the Common Zambezi River System (ZACPLAN). ZAMCOM took over the responsibility from the bi-national Zambezi River Authority (ZRA).

Monitoring and Information Systems

All member states are obliged to inform ZAMCOM of any program, project or activity with regard to the Zambezi watercourse. If one of the other member states opposes planned measures or activities, they are required to start consultations and negotiations and reach a solution. The project is to be postponed during these negotiations. Furthermore, the Commission can conduct a fact-finding study to support the negotiation process.

Rules on Decision-Making and Procedure for Dispute Resolution

Decisions are taken unanimously, with two thirds of the member states forming a quorum. In case of a dispute the member states are required to enter into consultations and negotiations. The Council of Ministers may give recommendations. If a dispute cannot be settled, it can be referred to the SADC Tribunal. Disputes between a member state and ZAMCOM can also be brought before the Tribunal.

Financing of cooperation structures

All member states contribute equally to the budget of the Commission. Further details are to be elaborated by the Council.

Stakeholder Participation

All member states contribute equally to the budget of the Commission. Further details are to be elaborated by the Council.

Historical Record of Cooperation

Plans to establish a river basin organization have existed since the 1980s, but no serious progress was made towards institutionalization of a basin-wide cooperation. In 1987, the governments of the Riparian Countries adopted the Action Plan for the Environmentally Sound Management of the Common Zambezi River System (ZACPLAN). Angola, Namibia, and Malawi joined these efforts in 1990. ZACPLAN consists of 19 projects, the so-called Zambezi Action Projects (ZACPRO). In 2002 the SADC Secretariat headed several rounds of negotiations until finally in July 2004 the Agreement establishing the Zambezi Watercourse Commission (ZAMCOM) was signed.

Date Treaty name Signatories Basin
1891-06-11
Spheres of Influence Treaty
Great Britain
Limpopo basin
1953-01-21
Shire Valley Participation Tretay
Great Britain
Portugal
Zambia basin
1954-11-18
Kwando River Agreement
Great Britain
Portugal
-
1963-11-25
Power Corp Agreement
Northern Rhodesia
Southern Rhodesia
Zambia basin
1967-04-01
Hydropower Agreement
Portugal
South Africa
Zambia basin
1984-05-02
Cahora Bassa Project
Mozambique
Portugal
South Africa
Zambia basin
1987-05-28
Action Plan
Botswana
Mozambique
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Zambia basin
1987-07-28
Zambezi River Utilization Agreement
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Zambia basin
2004-07-13
ZAMCOM Agreement
Angola
Botswana
Malawi
Mozambique
Namibia
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Zambia basin
Challenges

Very large underdeveloped basin, rampant poverty, hydropower/irrigation potential partially tapped, environmental impact assessment required, Zambia (41% of basin area) not a member of ZAMCOM, low stakeholder involvement and limited financial resources, lack of basinwide organization for water resources management, inadequate political dialogue on IWRM, lack of common vision, inadequate funding and lack of cooperation mechanism.